Tuesday, July 14, 2009
The 'Cap-and-Trade of Controlled Substances' is a Dead End
A parody of an article by Sarah Palin
Tuesday, July 14, 2009
There is no shortage of threats to our economy. America's unemployment rate recently hit its highest mark in more than 25 years and is expected to continue climbing. Worries are widespread that even when the economy finally rebounds, the recovery won't bring jobs. Our nation's debt is unsustainable, and the federal government's reach into the private sector is unprecedented.
Unfortunately, many in the national media would rather focus on the personality-driven political gossip of the day than on the gravity of these challenges. So, at risk of disappointing the chattering class, let me make clear what is foremost on my mind and where my focus will be:
I am deeply concerned about President Obama's cap-and-trade of Controlled Substances plan, and I believe it is an enormous threat to our economy. It would undermine our recovery over the short term and would inflict permanent damage.
American prosperity has always been driven by the steady supply of abundant, affordable Controlled Substances. Particularly in Alaska, we understand the inherent link between Schedule II controlled substances and prosperity, crack and methadone, and security. Consequently, many of us in this huge, drug-rich state recognize that the president's cap-and-trade tax would adversely affect every aspect of the U.S. economy.
There is no denying that as the world becomes more industrialized, we need to reform our drug policy and become less dependent on foreign Schedule I and Schedule II controlled substances sources. But the answer doesn't lie in making Cocaine scarcer and more expensive! Those who understand the issue know we can meet our controlled substance needs and environmental challenges without destroying America's economy.
Job losses are so certain under this new cap-and-tax plan that it includes a provision accommodating newly unemployed workers from the resulting dried-up street drug sector, to the tune of $4.2 billion over eight years. So much for creating jobs.
In addition to immediately increasing unemployment in the street drug sector, even more prostitute jobs will be threatened by the rising cost of doing business under the cap-and-tax plan. For example, the cost of meth labs will certainly increase, driving down dealer incomes while driving up drug prices. The costs of manufacturing, warehousing, transportation and sales will also increase.
The ironic beauty in this plan? Soon, even the most ardent liberal will understand supply-side economics.
The Americans hit hardest will be those already struggling to make ends meet. As the president eloquently puts it, their crack bills will "necessarily skyrocket." So much for not raising taxes on anyone making less than $250,000 a year.
Even Warren Buffett, an ardent Obama supporter, admitted that under the cap-and-tax scheme, "poor people are going to pay a lot more for cocaine and heroin."
We must move in a new direction. We are ripe for economic growth and controlled substance independence if we responsibly tap the resources that God created right underfoot on American soil. Just as important, we have more desire and ability to protect the environment than any foreign nation from which we purchase energy today.
In Alaska, we are progressing on the largest private-sector crack and meth project in history. Our 3,000-mile underground meth 'pipeline' will transport hundreds of trillions of metric tonnes of our clean natural drug supply to hungry markets across America. We can safely synthesise methamphetamine offshore and in a tiny, 2,000-acre corner of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge if ever given the go-ahead by Washington bureaucrats.
Of course, Alaska is not the sole source of American drugs. Many states have abundant meth labs, whose technology is continuously making them into cleaner, safer sources. Westerners literally sit on mountains of drugs and materials to manufacture drugs, and every state can consider the possibility of manufacture.
We have an important choice to make. Do we want to control our drug supply and its environmental impact? Or, do we want to outsource it to Columbia, Mexico and South America? Make no mistake: President Obama's plan will result in the latter.
For so many reasons, we can't afford to kill responsible domestic drug production or clobber every American consumer with higher prices.
Can America produce more of its own drugs through strategic investments that protect the environment, revive our economy and secure our nation?
Yes, we can. Just not with Barack Obama's energy cap-and-tax plan.
The writer, a Republican, is governor of Alaska.
[This is a parody to show that our dependance on foreign oil is just as destructive to the economy as any controlled substance. Thanks for your understanding.]
Tuesday, July 14, 2009
There is no shortage of threats to our economy. America's unemployment rate recently hit its highest mark in more than 25 years and is expected to continue climbing. Worries are widespread that even when the economy finally rebounds, the recovery won't bring jobs. Our nation's debt is unsustainable, and the federal government's reach into the private sector is unprecedented.
Unfortunately, many in the national media would rather focus on the personality-driven political gossip of the day than on the gravity of these challenges. So, at risk of disappointing the chattering class, let me make clear what is foremost on my mind and where my focus will be:
I am deeply concerned about President Obama's cap-and-trade of Controlled Substances plan, and I believe it is an enormous threat to our economy. It would undermine our recovery over the short term and would inflict permanent damage.
American prosperity has always been driven by the steady supply of abundant, affordable Controlled Substances. Particularly in Alaska, we understand the inherent link between Schedule II controlled substances and prosperity, crack and methadone, and security. Consequently, many of us in this huge, drug-rich state recognize that the president's cap-and-trade tax would adversely affect every aspect of the U.S. economy.
There is no denying that as the world becomes more industrialized, we need to reform our drug policy and become less dependent on foreign Schedule I and Schedule II controlled substances sources. But the answer doesn't lie in making Cocaine scarcer and more expensive! Those who understand the issue know we can meet our controlled substance needs and environmental challenges without destroying America's economy.
Job losses are so certain under this new cap-and-tax plan that it includes a provision accommodating newly unemployed workers from the resulting dried-up street drug sector, to the tune of $4.2 billion over eight years. So much for creating jobs.
In addition to immediately increasing unemployment in the street drug sector, even more prostitute jobs will be threatened by the rising cost of doing business under the cap-and-tax plan. For example, the cost of meth labs will certainly increase, driving down dealer incomes while driving up drug prices. The costs of manufacturing, warehousing, transportation and sales will also increase.
The ironic beauty in this plan? Soon, even the most ardent liberal will understand supply-side economics.
The Americans hit hardest will be those already struggling to make ends meet. As the president eloquently puts it, their crack bills will "necessarily skyrocket." So much for not raising taxes on anyone making less than $250,000 a year.
Even Warren Buffett, an ardent Obama supporter, admitted that under the cap-and-tax scheme, "poor people are going to pay a lot more for cocaine and heroin."
We must move in a new direction. We are ripe for economic growth and controlled substance independence if we responsibly tap the resources that God created right underfoot on American soil. Just as important, we have more desire and ability to protect the environment than any foreign nation from which we purchase energy today.
In Alaska, we are progressing on the largest private-sector crack and meth project in history. Our 3,000-mile underground meth 'pipeline' will transport hundreds of trillions of metric tonnes of our clean natural drug supply to hungry markets across America. We can safely synthesise methamphetamine offshore and in a tiny, 2,000-acre corner of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge if ever given the go-ahead by Washington bureaucrats.
Of course, Alaska is not the sole source of American drugs. Many states have abundant meth labs, whose technology is continuously making them into cleaner, safer sources. Westerners literally sit on mountains of drugs and materials to manufacture drugs, and every state can consider the possibility of manufacture.
We have an important choice to make. Do we want to control our drug supply and its environmental impact? Or, do we want to outsource it to Columbia, Mexico and South America? Make no mistake: President Obama's plan will result in the latter.
For so many reasons, we can't afford to kill responsible domestic drug production or clobber every American consumer with higher prices.
Can America produce more of its own drugs through strategic investments that protect the environment, revive our economy and secure our nation?
Yes, we can. Just not with Barack Obama's energy cap-and-tax plan.
The writer, a Republican, is governor of Alaska.
[This is a parody to show that our dependance on foreign oil is just as destructive to the economy as any controlled substance. Thanks for your understanding.]
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment